|
@@ -22,3 +22,22 @@ it detects the length of the string it's processing increases. Remember that
|
|
|
absolutely NO guarantee is provided about the results of ``strip_tags()`` being
|
|
|
HTML safe. So NEVER mark safe the result of a ``strip_tags()`` call without
|
|
|
escaping it first, for example with :func:`~django.utils.html.escape`.
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+Mitigated possible XSS attack via user-supplied redirect URLs
|
|
|
+=============================================================
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+Django relies on user input in some cases (e.g.
|
|
|
+:func:`django.contrib.auth.views.login` and :doc:`i18n </topics/i18n/index>`)
|
|
|
+to redirect the user to an "on success" URL. The security checks for these
|
|
|
+redirects (namely ``django.utils.http.is_safe_url()``) accepted URLs with
|
|
|
+leading control characters and so considered URLs like ``\x08javascript:...``
|
|
|
+safe. This issue doesn't affect Django currently, since we only put this URL
|
|
|
+into the ``Location`` response header and browsers seem to ignore JavaScript
|
|
|
+there. Browsers we tested also treat URLs prefixed with control characters such
|
|
|
+as ``%08//example.com`` as relative paths so redirection to an unsafe target
|
|
|
+isn't a problem either.
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+However, if a developer relies on ``is_safe_url()`` to
|
|
|
+provide safe redirect targets and puts such a URL into a link, they could
|
|
|
+suffer from an XSS attack as some browsers such as Google Chrome ignore control
|
|
|
+characters at the start of a URL in an anchor ``href``.
|