Browse Source

Added missing backticks to function names.

Mariusz Felisiak 3 years ago
parent
commit
39ae8d740e

+ 2 - 2
docs/ref/models/querysets.txt

@@ -1618,8 +1618,8 @@ one, doing so will result in an error.
     the full set of fields for the model will be significant.
 
     Even if you think you are in the advanced use-case situation, **only use
-    defer() when you cannot, at queryset load time, determine if you will need
-    the extra fields or not**. If you are frequently loading and using a
+    ``defer()`` when you cannot, at queryset load time, determine if you will
+    need the extra fields or not**. If you are frequently loading and using a
     particular subset of your data, the best choice you can make is to
     normalize your models and put the non-loaded data into a separate model
     (and database table). If the columns *must* stay in the one table for some

+ 2 - 1
docs/ref/utils.txt

@@ -332,7 +332,8 @@ https://web.archive.org/web/20110718035220/http://diveintomark.org/archives/2004
 
 .. class:: SyndicationFeed
 
-    Base class for all syndication feeds. Subclasses should provide write().
+    Base class for all syndication feeds. Subclasses should provide
+    ``write()``.
 
     .. method:: __init__(title, link, description, language=None, author_email=None, author_name=None, author_link=None, subtitle=None, categories=None, feed_url=None, feed_copyright=None, feed_guid=None, ttl=None, **kwargs)
 

+ 3 - 3
docs/releases/0.95.txt

@@ -71,9 +71,9 @@ The new features and changes introduced in 0.95 include:
   URLconfs/views on their own. Previously, the framework required that a
   database be configured, regardless of whether you actually used it.
 
-* It's now more explicit and natural to override save() and delete()
-  methods on models, rather than needing to hook into the pre_save() and
-  post_save() method hooks.
+* It's now more explicit and natural to override ``save()`` and ``delete()``
+  methods on models, rather than needing to hook into the ``pre_save()`` and
+  ``post_save()`` method hooks.
 
 * Individual pieces of the framework now can be configured without
   requiring the setting of an environment variable. This permits use of,

+ 3 - 3
docs/releases/1.7.txt

@@ -976,12 +976,12 @@ every time you change the schema.
 Additionally, like the rest of Django's old ``syncdb`` code, ``initial_data``
 has been started down the deprecation path and will be removed in Django 1.9.
 
-deconstruct() and serializability
----------------------------------
+``deconstruct()`` and serializability
+-------------------------------------
 
 Django now requires all Field classes and all of their constructor arguments
 to be serializable. If you modify the constructor signature in your custom
-Field in any way, you'll need to implement a deconstruct() method;
+Field in any way, you'll need to implement a ``deconstruct()`` method;
 we've expanded the custom field documentation with :ref:`instructions
 on implementing this method <custom-field-deconstruct-method>`.
 

+ 1 - 1
docs/topics/db/examples/many_to_one.txt

@@ -169,7 +169,7 @@ Querying in the opposite direction::
     >>> Reporter.objects.filter(article__headline__startswith='This').distinct()
     <QuerySet [<Reporter: John Smith>]>
 
-Counting in the opposite direction works in conjunction with distinct()::
+Counting in the opposite direction works in conjunction with ``distinct()``::
 
     >>> Reporter.objects.filter(article__headline__startswith='This').count()
     3

+ 1 - 1
docs/topics/db/sql.txt

@@ -165,7 +165,7 @@ fields that are omitted from the query will be loaded on demand. For example::
 
 From outward appearances, this looks like the query has retrieved both
 the first name and last name. However, this example actually issued 3
-queries. Only the first names were retrieved by the raw() query -- the
+queries. Only the first names were retrieved by the ``raw()`` query -- the
 last names were both retrieved on demand when they were printed.
 
 There is only one field that you can't leave out - the primary key

+ 2 - 2
docs/topics/forms/modelforms.txt

@@ -247,8 +247,8 @@ validation step, right after the form's ``clean()`` method is called.
 
 .. _overriding-modelform-clean-method:
 
-Overriding the clean() method
-~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
+Overriding the ``clean()`` method
+~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
 
 You can override the ``clean()`` method on a model form to provide additional
 validation in the same way you can on a normal form.