|
@@ -601,15 +601,16 @@ Assuming both models have a ``length`` field, to find posts where the post
|
|
|
length is greater than the total length of all combined comments::
|
|
|
|
|
|
>>> from django.db.models import OuterRef, Subquery, Sum
|
|
|
- >>> comments = Comment.objects.filter(post=OuterRef('pk')).values('post')
|
|
|
+ >>> comments = Comment.objects.filter(post=OuterRef('pk')).order_by().values('post')
|
|
|
>>> total_comments = comments.annotate(total=Sum('length')).values('total')
|
|
|
>>> Post.objects.filter(length__gt=Subquery(total_comments))
|
|
|
|
|
|
The initial ``filter(...)`` limits the subquery to the relevant parameters.
|
|
|
-``values('post')`` aggregates comments by ``Post``. Finally, ``annotate(...)``
|
|
|
-performs the aggregation. The order in which these queryset methods are applied
|
|
|
-is important. In this case, since the subquery must be limited to a single
|
|
|
-column, ``values('total')`` is required.
|
|
|
+``order_by()`` removes the default :attr:`~django.db.models.Options.ordering`
|
|
|
+(if any) on the ``Comment`` model. ``values('post')`` aggregates comments by
|
|
|
+``Post``. Finally, ``annotate(...)`` performs the aggregation. The order in
|
|
|
+which these queryset methods are applied is important. In this case, since the
|
|
|
+subquery must be limited to a single column, ``values('total')`` is required.
|
|
|
|
|
|
This is the only way to perform an aggregation within a ``Subquery``, as
|
|
|
using :meth:`~.QuerySet.aggregate` attempts to evaluate the queryset (and if
|