Browse Source

Fixed #17269 -- Corrected the model options doc to indicate that, since 1.4, all fields in `Meta.ordering` are honored by the admin. Thanks to sebastian for the report and patch.

git-svn-id: http://code.djangoproject.com/svn/django/trunk@17130 bcc190cf-cafb-0310-a4f2-bffc1f526a37
Julien Phalip 13 years ago
parent
commit
aa5230c4be
1 changed files with 4 additions and 5 deletions
  1. 4 5
      docs/ref/models/options.txt

+ 4 - 5
docs/ref/models/options.txt

@@ -189,11 +189,6 @@ Django quotes column and table names behind the scenes.
     "-" prefix, which indicates descending order. Fields without a leading "-" will
     be ordered ascending. Use the string "?" to order randomly.
 
-    .. note::
-
-        Regardless of how many fields are in :attr:`~Options.ordering`, the admin
-        site uses only the first field.
-
     For example, to order by a ``pub_date`` field ascending, use this::
 
         ordering = ['pub_date']
@@ -206,6 +201,10 @@ Django quotes column and table names behind the scenes.
 
         ordering = ['-pub_date', 'author']
 
+    .. versionchanged:: 1.4
+       The Django admin honors all elements in the list/tuple; before 1.4, only
+       the first one was respected.
+
 ``permissions``
 ---------------