django/docs/topics/db/transactions.txt

==============================
Managing database transactions
==============================

.. module:: django.db.transaction

Django gives you a few ways to control how database transactions are managed.

Django's default transaction behavior
=====================================

Django's default behavior is to run in autocommit mode. Each query is
immediately committed to the database. :ref:`See below for details
<autocommit-details>`.

..
   Django uses transactions or savepoints automatically to guarantee the
   integrity of ORM operations that require multiple queries, especially
   :ref:`delete() <topics-db-queries-delete>` and :ref:`update()
   <topics-db-queries-update>` queries.

.. versionchanged:: 1.6
    Previous version of Django featured :ref:`a more complicated default
    behavior <transactions-changes-from-1.5>`.

Tying transactions to HTTP requests
===================================

The recommended way to handle transactions in Web requests is to tie them to
the request and response phases via Django's ``TransactionMiddleware``.

It works like this. When a request starts, Django starts a transaction. If the
response is produced without problems, Django commits any pending transactions.
If the view function produces an exception, Django rolls back any pending
transactions.

To activate this feature, just add the ``TransactionMiddleware`` middleware to
your :setting:`MIDDLEWARE_CLASSES` setting::

    MIDDLEWARE_CLASSES = (
        'django.middleware.cache.UpdateCacheMiddleware',
        'django.contrib.sessions.middleware.SessionMiddleware',
        'django.middleware.common.CommonMiddleware',
        'django.middleware.transaction.TransactionMiddleware',
        'django.middleware.cache.FetchFromCacheMiddleware',
    )

The order is quite important. The transaction middleware applies not only to
view functions, but also for all middleware modules that come after it. So if
you use the session middleware after the transaction middleware, session
creation will be part of the transaction.

The various cache middlewares are an exception: ``CacheMiddleware``,
:class:`~django.middleware.cache.UpdateCacheMiddleware`, and
:class:`~django.middleware.cache.FetchFromCacheMiddleware` are never affected.
Even when using database caching, Django's cache backend uses its own database
connection internally.

.. note::

    The ``TransactionMiddleware`` only affects the database aliased
    as "default" within your :setting:`DATABASES` setting.  If you are using
    multiple databases and want transaction control over databases other than
    "default", you will need to write your own transaction middleware.

.. _transaction-management-functions:

Controlling transaction management in views
===========================================

For most people, implicit request-based transactions work wonderfully. However,
if you need more fine-grained control over how transactions are managed, you can
use a set of functions in ``django.db.transaction`` to control transactions on a
per-function or per-code-block basis.

These functions, described in detail below, can be used in two different ways:

* As a decorator_ on a particular function. For example::

    from django.db import transaction

    @transaction.commit_on_success
    def viewfunc(request):
        # ...
        # this code executes inside a transaction
        # ...

* As a `context manager`_ around a particular block of code::

    from django.db import transaction

    def viewfunc(request):
        # ...
        # this code executes using default transaction management
        # ...

        with transaction.commit_on_success():
            # ...
            # this code executes inside a transaction
            # ...

Both techniques work with all supported version of Python.

.. _decorator: http://docs.python.org/glossary.html#term-decorator
.. _context manager: http://docs.python.org/glossary.html#term-context-manager

For maximum compatibility, all of the examples below show transactions using the
decorator syntax, but all of the follow functions may be used as context
managers, too.

.. note::

    Although the examples below use view functions as examples, these
    decorators and context managers can be used anywhere in your code
    that you need to deal with transactions.

.. _topics-db-transactions-autocommit:

.. function:: autocommit

    Use the ``autocommit`` decorator to switch a view function to Django's
    default commit behavior.

    Example::

        from django.db import transaction

        @transaction.autocommit
        def viewfunc(request):
            ....

        @transaction.autocommit(using="my_other_database")
        def viewfunc2(request):
            ....

    Within ``viewfunc()``, transactions will be committed as soon as you call
    ``model.save()``, ``model.delete()``, or any other function that writes to
    the database.  ``viewfunc2()`` will have this same behavior, but for the
    ``"my_other_database"`` connection.

.. function:: commit_on_success

    Use the ``commit_on_success`` decorator to use a single transaction for all
    the work done in a function::

        from django.db import transaction

        @transaction.commit_on_success
        def viewfunc(request):
            ....

        @transaction.commit_on_success(using="my_other_database")
        def viewfunc2(request):
            ....

    If the function returns successfully, then Django will commit all work done
    within the function at that point. If the function raises an exception,
    though, Django will roll back the transaction.

.. function:: commit_manually

    Use the ``commit_manually`` decorator if you need full control over
    transactions. It tells Django you'll be managing the transaction on your
    own.

    Whether you are writing or simply reading from the database, you must
    ``commit()`` or ``rollback()`` explicitly or Django will raise a
    :exc:`TransactionManagementError` exception. This is required when reading
    from the database because ``SELECT`` statements may call functions which
    modify tables, and thus it is impossible to know if any data has been
    modified.

    Manual transaction management looks like this::

        from django.db import transaction

        @transaction.commit_manually
        def viewfunc(request):
            ...
            # You can commit/rollback however and whenever you want
            transaction.commit()
            ...

            # But you've got to remember to do it yourself!
            try:
                ...
            except:
                transaction.rollback()
            else:
                transaction.commit()

        @transaction.commit_manually(using="my_other_database")
        def viewfunc2(request):
            ....

.. _topics-db-transactions-requirements:

Requirements for transaction handling
=====================================

Django requires that every transaction that is opened is closed before the
completion of a request.

If you are using :func:`autocommit` (the default commit mode) or
:func:`commit_on_success`, this will be done for you automatically. However,
if you are manually managing transactions (using the :func:`commit_manually`
decorator), you must ensure that the transaction is either committed or rolled
back before a request is completed.

This applies to all database operations, not just write operations. Even
if your transaction only reads from the database, the transaction must
be committed or rolled back before you complete a request.

.. _managing-autocommit:

Managing autocommit
===================

.. versionadded:: 1.6

Django provides a straightforward API to manage the autocommit state of each
database connection, if you need to.

.. function:: get_autocommit(using=None)

.. function:: set_autocommit(using=None, autocommit=True)

These functions take a ``using`` argument which should be the name of a
database. If it isn't provided, Django uses the ``"default"`` database.

.. _deactivate-transaction-management:

How to globally deactivate transaction management
=================================================

Control freaks can totally disable all transaction management by setting
:setting:`TRANSACTIONS_MANAGED` to ``True`` in the Django settings file. If
you do this, Django won't enable autocommit. You'll get the regular behavior
of the underlying database library.

This requires you to commit explicitly every transaction, even those started
by Django or by third-party libraries. Thus, this is best used in situations
where you want to run your own transaction-controlling middleware or do
something really strange.

In almost all situations, you'll be better off using the default behavior, or
the transaction middleware, and only modify selected functions as needed.

.. _topics-db-transactions-savepoints:

Savepoints
==========

A savepoint is a marker within a transaction that enables you to roll back part
of a transaction, rather than the full transaction. Savepoints are available
with the PostgreSQL 8, Oracle and MySQL (when using the InnoDB storage engine)
backends. Other backends provide the savepoint functions, but they're empty
operations -- they don't actually do anything.

Savepoints aren't especially useful if you are using the default
``autocommit`` behavior of Django. However, if you are using
``commit_on_success`` or ``commit_manually``, each open transaction will build
up a series of database operations, awaiting a commit or rollback. If you
issue a rollback, the entire transaction is rolled back. Savepoints provide
the ability to perform a fine-grained rollback, rather than the full rollback
that would be performed by ``transaction.rollback()``.

Each of these functions takes a ``using`` argument which should be the name of
a database for which the behavior applies.  If no ``using`` argument is
provided then the ``"default"`` database is used.

Savepoints are controlled by three methods on the transaction object:

.. method:: transaction.savepoint(using=None)

    Creates a new savepoint. This marks a point in the transaction that
    is known to be in a "good" state.

    Returns the savepoint ID (sid).

.. method:: transaction.savepoint_commit(sid, using=None)

    Updates the savepoint to include any operations that have been performed
    since the savepoint was created, or since the last commit.

.. method:: transaction.savepoint_rollback(sid, using=None)

    Rolls the transaction back to the last point at which the savepoint was
    committed.

The following example demonstrates the use of savepoints::

    from django.db import transaction

    @transaction.commit_manually
    def viewfunc(request):

      a.save()
      # open transaction now contains a.save()
      sid = transaction.savepoint()

      b.save()
      # open transaction now contains a.save() and b.save()

      if want_to_keep_b:
          transaction.savepoint_commit(sid)
          # open transaction still contains a.save() and b.save()
      else:
          transaction.savepoint_rollback(sid)
          # open transaction now contains only a.save()

      transaction.commit()

Database-specific notes
=======================

Transactions in MySQL
---------------------

If you're using MySQL, your tables may or may not support transactions; it
depends on your MySQL version and the table types you're using. (By
"table types," we mean something like "InnoDB" or "MyISAM".) MySQL transaction
peculiarities are outside the scope of this article, but the MySQL site has
`information on MySQL transactions`_.

If your MySQL setup does *not* support transactions, then Django will function
in autocommit mode: Statements will be executed and committed as soon as
they're called. If your MySQL setup *does* support transactions, Django will
handle transactions as explained in this document.

.. _information on MySQL transactions: http://dev.mysql.com/doc/refman/5.0/en/sql-syntax-transactions.html

Handling exceptions within PostgreSQL transactions
--------------------------------------------------

When a call to a PostgreSQL cursor raises an exception (typically
``IntegrityError``), all subsequent SQL in the same transaction will fail with
the error "current transaction is aborted, queries ignored until end of
transaction block". Whilst simple use of ``save()`` is unlikely to raise an
exception in PostgreSQL, there are more advanced usage patterns which
might, such as saving objects with unique fields, saving using the
force_insert/force_update flag, or invoking custom SQL.

There are several ways to recover from this sort of error.

Transaction rollback
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

The first option is to roll back the entire transaction. For example::

    a.save() # Succeeds, but may be undone by transaction rollback
    try:
        b.save() # Could throw exception
    except IntegrityError:
        transaction.rollback()
    c.save() # Succeeds, but a.save() may have been undone

Calling ``transaction.rollback()`` rolls back the entire transaction. Any
uncommitted database operations will be lost. In this example, the changes
made by ``a.save()`` would be lost, even though that operation raised no error
itself.

Savepoint rollback
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

If you are using PostgreSQL 8 or later, you can use :ref:`savepoints
<topics-db-transactions-savepoints>` to control the extent of a rollback.
Before performing a database operation that could fail, you can set or update
the savepoint; that way, if the operation fails, you can roll back the single
offending operation, rather than the entire transaction. For example::

    a.save() # Succeeds, and never undone by savepoint rollback
    try:
        sid = transaction.savepoint()
        b.save() # Could throw exception
        transaction.savepoint_commit(sid)
    except IntegrityError:
        transaction.savepoint_rollback(sid)
    c.save() # Succeeds, and a.save() is never undone

In this example, ``a.save()`` will not be undone in the case where
``b.save()`` raises an exception.

Under the hood
==============

.. _autocommit-details:

Details on autocommit
---------------------

In the SQL standards, each SQL query starts a transaction, unless one is
already in progress. Such transactions must then be committed or rolled back.

This isn't always convenient for application developers. To alleviate this
problem, most databases provide an autocommit mode. When autocommit is turned
on, each SQL query is wrapped in its own transaction. In other words, the
transaction is not only automatically started, but also automatically
committed.

:pep:`249`, the Python Database API Specification v2.0, requires autocommit to
be initially turned off. Django overrides this default and turns autocommit
on.

To avoid this, you can :ref:`deactivate the transaction management
<deactivate-transaction-management>`, but it isn't recommended.

.. versionchanged:: 1.6
    Before Django 1.6, autocommit was turned off, and it was emulated by
    forcing a commit after write operations in the ORM.

.. warning::

    If you're using the database API directly — for instance, you're running
    SQL queries with ``cursor.execute()`` — be aware that autocommit is on,
    and consider wrapping your operations in a transaction to ensure
    consistency.

.. _transaction-states:

Transaction management states
-----------------------------

At any time, each database connection is in one of these two states:

- **auto mode**: autocommit is enabled;
- **managed mode**: autocommit is disabled.

Django starts in auto mode. ``TransactionMiddleware``,
:func:`commit_on_success` and :func:`commit_manually` activate managed mode;
:func:`autocommit` activates auto mode.

Internally, Django keeps a stack of states. Activations and deactivations must
be balanced.

For example, at the beginning of each HTTP request, ``TransactionMiddleware``
switches to managed mode; at the end of the request, it commits or rollbacks,
and switches back to auto mode.

.. admonition:: Nesting decorators / context managers

    :func:`commit_on_success` has two effects: it changes the transaction
    state, and defines an atomic transaction block.

    Nesting with :func:`autocommit` and :func:`commit_manually` will give the
    expected results in terms of transaction state, but not in terms of
    transaction semantics. Most often, the inner block will commit, breaking
    the atomicity of the outer block.

Django currently doesn't provide any APIs to create transactions in auto mode.

.. _transactions-changes-from-1.5:

Changes from Django 1.5 and earlier
===================================

Since version 1.6, Django uses database-level autocommit in auto mode.

Previously, it implemented application-level autocommit by triggering a commit
after each ORM write.

As a consequence, each database query (for instance, an
ORM read) started a transaction that lasted until the next ORM write. Such
"automatic transactions" no longer exist in Django 1.6.

There are four known scenarios where this is backwards-incompatible.

Note that managed mode isn't affected at all. This section assumes auto mode.
See the :ref:`description of modes <transaction-states>` above.

Sequences of custom SQL queries
-------------------------------

If you're executing several :ref:`custom SQL queries <executing-custom-sql>`
in a row, each one now runs in its own transaction, instead of sharing the
same "automatic transaction". If you need to enforce atomicity, you must wrap
the sequence of queries in :func:`commit_on_success`.

To check for this problem, look for calls to ``cursor.execute()``. They're
usually followed by a call to ``transaction.commit_unless_managed``, which
isn't necessary any more and should be removed.

Select for update
-----------------

If you were relying on "automatic transactions" to provide locking between
:meth:`~django.db.models.query.QuerySet.select_for_update` and a subsequent
write operation — an extremely fragile design, but nonetheless possible — you
must wrap the relevant code in :func:`commit_on_success`.

Using a high isolation level
----------------------------

If you were using the "repeatable read" isolation level or higher, and if you
relied on "automatic transactions" to guarantee consistency between successive
reads, the new behavior is backwards-incompatible. To maintain consistency,
you must wrap such sequences in :func:`commit_on_success`.

MySQL defaults to "repeatable read" and SQLite to "serializable"; they may be
affected by this problem.

At the "read committed" isolation level or lower, "automatic transactions"
have no effect on the semantics of any sequence of ORM operations.

PostgreSQL and Oracle default to "read committed" and aren't affected, unless
you changed the isolation level.

Using unsupported database features
-----------------------------------

With triggers, views, or functions, it's possible to make ORM reads result in
database modifications. Django 1.5 and earlier doesn't deal with this case and
it's theoretically possible to observe a different behavior after upgrading to
Django 1.6 or later. In doubt, use :func:`commit_on_success` to enforce
integrity.