123456789101112131415161718192021222324252627282930313233343536373839404142434445464748495051525354555657585960616263646566676869707172737475767778798081828384858687888990919293949596979899100101102103104105106107108109110111112113114115116117118119120121122123124125126127128129130131132133134135136137138139140141142143144145146147148149150151152153154155156157158159160161162163164165166167168169170171172173174175176177178179180181182183184185186187188189190191192193194195196197198199200201202203204205206207208209210211212213214215216217218219220221222 |
- Working with Git and GitHub
- ===========================
- Django uses `Git`_ for its source control. You can `download
- <http://git-scm.com/download>`_ Git, but it's often easier to install with
- your operating system's package manager.
- Django's `Git repository`_ is hosted on `GitHub`_, and it is recommended
- that you also work using GitHub.
- After installing Git the first thing you should do is setup your name and
- email::
- $ git config --global user.name "Firstname Lastname"
- $ git config --global user.email "your_email@youremail.com"
- Note that ``user.name`` should be your real name, not your GitHub nick. GitHub
- should know the email you use in the ``user.email`` field, as this will be
- used to associate your commits with your GitHub account.
- Now we are going to show how to create a GitHub pull request containing the
- changes for Trac ticket #xxxxx. By creating a fully ready pull request you
- will make the committers' job easier, and thus your work is more likely to be
- merged into Django. You can also upload a traditional patch to Trac, but it's
- less practical for reviews.
- .. _Git: http://git-scm.com/
- .. _GitHub: https://github.com/
- .. _Git repository: https://github.com/django/django/
- Setting up local repository
- ---------------------------
- When you have created a GitHub account, with the nick "github_nick", and
- forked Django's repository, you should create a local copy of your fork::
- git clone git@github.com:github_nick/django.git
- This will create a new directory "django" containing a clone of your GitHub
- repository. Your GitHub repository will be called "origin" in Git. You should
- also setup django/django as an "upstream" remote::
- git remote add upstream git@github.com:django/django.git
- git fetch upstream
- You can add other remotes similarly, for example::
- git remote add akaariai git@github.com:akaariai/django.git
- Working on a ticket
- -------------------
- When working on a ticket you will almost always want to create a new branch
- for the work, and base that work on upstream/master::
- git checkout -b ticket_xxxxx upstream/master
- If you are working for a fix on the 1.4 branch, you would instead do::
- git checkout -b ticket_xxxxx_1_4 upstream/stable/1.4.x
- Assume the work is carried on ticket_xxxxx branch. Make some changes and
- commit them::
- git commit
- When writing the commit message, you should follow the :ref:`commit message
- guidelines <committing-guidlines>` to ease the work of the committer. If
- you're uncomfortable with English, try at least to describe precisely what the
- commit does.
- If you need to do additional work on your branch, commit as often as
- necessary::
- git commit -m 'Added two more tests for edge cases'
- Publishing work
- ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
- You can publish your work on GitHub by just using::
- git push origin ticket_xxxxx
- When you go to your GitHub page you will notice a new branch has been created.
- If you are working on a Trac ticket, you should mention in the ticket that
- your work is available from branch ticket_xxxxx of your github repo. Include a
- link to your branch.
- Note that the above branch is called a "topic branch" in Git parlance. This
- means that other people should not base their work on your branch. In
- particular this means you are free to rewrite the history of this branch (by
- using ``git rebase`` for example). There are also "public branches". These are
- branches other people are supposed to fork, and thus their history should
- never change. Good examples of public branches are the ``master`` and
- ``stable/A.B.x`` branches in the django/django repository.
- When you think your work is ready to be pulled into Django, you should create
- a pull request at GitHub. A good pull request contains:
- * Commits with one logical change in each, following the
- :doc:`coding style <coding-style>`.
- * Well formed messages for each commit: a summary line and then paragraphs
- wrapped at 72 characters thereafter. See the :ref:`committing guidelines
- <committing-guidlines>` for more details.
- * Documentation and tests, if needed. Actually tests are always needed, except
- for documentation changes.
- * The test suite passes and the documentation builds without warnings.
- Once you have created your pull request, you should add a comment in the
- related Trac ticket explaining what you've done. In particular you should tell
- in which environment you've run the tests, for instance: "all tests pass under
- SQLite and MySQL".
- Your pull request should be ready for merging into Django. Pull requests at
- GitHub have only two states: open and closed. The committers who deals with
- your pull request has only two options: merge it or close it. For this reason,
- it isn't useful to make a pull request until the code is ready for merging --
- or sufficiently close that a committer will finish it himself.
- Rebasing branches
- ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
- In the example above you created two commits, the "Fixed ticket_xxxxx" commit
- and "Added two more tests" commit. We do not want to have the "Added two more
- tests" commit in the Django's repository as it would just be useless noise.
- Instead, we would like to only have one commit. To rework the history of your
- branch you can squash the commits into one by using interactive rebase::
- git rebase -i HEAD~2
- The HEAD~2 above is shorthand for two latest commits. The above command
- will open an editor showing the two commits, prefixed with the word "pick".
- You should change the second line to "squash" instead. This will keep the
- first commit, and squash the second commit to the first one. Save and quit
- the editor. A second editor window should open. Here you can reword the
- commit message for the commit.
- You can also use the "edit" option in rebase. This way you can change a single
- commit. For example::
- git rebase -i HEAD~3
- # Choose edit, pick, pick for the commits
- # Now you are able to rework the commit (use git add normally to add changes)
- # When finished, commit work with "--amend" and continue
- git commit --amend
- # reword the commit message if needed
- git rebase --continue
- # The second and third commit should be applied.
- If you need to change an already published topic branch at GitHub, you will
- need to force-push the changes::
- git push -f origin ticket_xxxxx
- Note that this will rewrite history of ticket_xxxxx - if you check the commit
- hashes before and after the operation at GitHub you will notice that the
- commit hashes do not match any more. This is acceptable, as the branch is topic
- branch, and nobody should be basing their work on this branch.
- After upstream has changed
- ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
- When upstream (django/django) has changed, you should rebase your work. To
- do this, use::
- git fetch upstream
- git rebase
- The work is automatically rebased using the branch you forked on, in the
- example case using upstream/master.
- The rebase command removes all your local commits temporarily, applies the
- upstream commits, and then applies your local commits again on the work. If
- there are merge conflicts you will need to resolve them and then use ``git
- rebase --continue``. At any point you can use ``git rebase --abort`` to return
- to the original state.
- Note that you want to rebase on upstream, not merge the upstream. The reason
- for this is that by rebasing, your commits will always be on top of the
- upstream's work, not mixed with the changes in the upstream. This way your
- branch only contains commits related to its topic, and this makes squashing
- easier.
- After review
- ------------
- It is unusual to get any non-trivial amount of code into core without changes
- requested by reviewers. In this case, it is often a good idea to add the
- changes as one incremental commit to your work. This allows the reviewer to
- easily check what changes you have done::
- # Do changes required by the reviewer, commit often.
- # Before publishing the changes, rebase your work. Assume you added two
- # commits to the work.
- git rebase -i HEAD~2
- # squash the second commit into the first, write a commit message something
- # like this:
- Made changes asked in review by the_reviewer
- - Fixed whitespace errors in foo/bar
- - Reworded the doc string of the_method()
- # Push your work back to your github repo, there should not be any need
- # for force (-f) push, as you didn't touch the public commits in the rebase.
- git push origin ticket_xxxxx
- # Check your pull request, it should now contain the new commit, too.
- The committer is likely to squash the review commit into the previous commit
- when committing the code.
- Summary
- -------
- * Work on GitHub if possible.
- * Announce your work on the Trac ticket by linking to your GitHub branch.
- * When you have something ready, make a pull request.
- * Make your pull requests as good as you can.
- * When doing fixes to your work, use ``git rebase -i`` to squash the commits.
- * When upstream has changed, do ``git fetch upstream; git rebase``.
|